BSR Insight

A Weekly Newsletter for BSR Members | September 11, 2012

   
 

In This Issue

Editor's Note

Total Cost of Ownership and Sustainable Purchasing

Since the launch of BSR’s Center for Sustainable Procurement, we have been exploring how purchasing managers can wrangle sustainability data to make decisions about the products they buy.

This week, we look at how the total cost of ownership approach—which accounts for all costs associated with a product over its lifetime—can help give procurement a sustainability lens. BSR’s Jessica Davis Pluess spoke with Hilton Worldwide’s procurement expert and the director of Stanford University’s Global Supply Chain Management Forum to identify the challenges associated with using total cost of ownership, and the lessons this approach can lend to sustainable procurement.

Also this week, we share lessons from our work on human rights in the information and communications technology sector, and we highlight a new BSR report evaluating the effectiveness of global health partnerships between the pharmaceutical industry and NGOs, governments, and academia.


What Total Cost of Ownership Offers Sustainable Procurement Department Icon

In Depth

What Total Cost of Ownership Offers Sustainable Procurement

By Jessica Davis Pluess, Manager, Research, BSR

To explore the opportunities to align total cost of ownership, which captures the costs associated with a product over its lifetime, and sustainable procurement, which integrates sustainability data into everyday purchasing decisions, BSR gathered perspectives from experts in the field.

Read more 


Icon

Spotlight

Ten Lessons From a Year’s Hard Work in ICT and Human Rights

By Dunstan Allison Hope, Managing Director, Advisory Services, BSR

One year ago, we published a report on applying the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights to the information, communications, and technology (ICT) industry.

Today, we're publishing an updated version with 10 lessons based on the work we've done to put our thinking into practice. Here are five of those lessons:

  • Human rights impact assessments (HRIAs) at the level of the product, service, or technology (rather than more traditional HRIAs at the corporate or country level) can be especially important for ICT companies.
  • The speed of innovation in the ICT industry presents a daunting challenge for HRIAs, with products often changing during the course of a single assessment.
  • Applying a "tree structure"—a single policy that branches out to other issue-specific policies—works well for human rights policies in the ICT industry.
  • Outside headquarters, such as at the country or business unit level, the standard of human rights expertise in a company can be very low. Clear guidance is required.
  • ICT companies have a significant opportunity to enhance their human rights reporting—for example, by covering how they manage relationships with law-enforcement agencies.

Icon

Toolbox

Improving Partnerships to Solve Global Health Challenges

By Mark Little, Director, Healthcare, Advisory Services, BSR

BSR's new report on global health partnerships—an evaluation of 220 programs in more than 160 countries—reveals the challenges and success factors in partnerships between the pharmaceutical industry and NGOs, governments, and academia.

The report—for which BSR surveyed 20 pharmaceutical companies and interviewed experts from organizations including the World Health Organization, TB Alliance, GAVI Alliance, and the Global Fund—assessed the impact of partnerships formed around four health challenge areas: availability of treatment, health system infrastructure, research and development, and awareness/prevention.

The report identifies two main challenges:

  1. Because most partnerships involve one company, they do not fully benefit from the collective expertise that would come from having multiple companies involved.
  2. Until now, there has not been a uniform means of tracking outcomes and measuring the impact of these partnerships.

The report also lists critical success factors for global health partnerships:

  • Adoption of an approach based on health needs
  • Emphasis on broad-based, multicompany partnerships
  • Alignment of existing and future partnerships to maximize shared resources and expertise
  • Emphasis on existing country systems and local ownership
  • Implementation of tracking and measurement programs to evaluate impact